Cases 51 - 60 of 1,273
Harmon v. Downing et al
as 4:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Harmon
Defendant:
Alexander L. Downing, Unknown Wells, Unknown Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. USA
as 3:2023cv00559
Petitioner:
Dustin Blair Henry
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Blair v. Tony
as 5:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Woody A. Blair
Defendant:
Mrs. Tony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair v. Lowerre
as 9:2023cv01015
Petitioner:
Nailon Blair
Respondent:
E. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughan v. Bowers, et al
as 3:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Dominique Trent Vaughan
Defendant:
Col. Bowers, Captain Dupree and Captain Blair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Mustin v. Lyneal Wainwright, et al
as 23-3671
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH MUSTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LYNEAL WAINWRIGHT, Warden, in her individual and official capacity, RANDON WATSON, in his individual capacity, BLAIR SMITH, in his individual and official capacity and others
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
Bey v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv02601
Plaintiff:
Jamal M. Bey
Defendant:
Chaplain Blaire Smith and Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEIL v. TATE et al.
as 3:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
JASON PAUL NEIL
Defendant:
WARDEN ABBY TATE, DEPUTY WARDEN EDMUNDSON, LIEUTENANT FOGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Jackson County, Mississippi
as 23-60405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jacob Blair Scott
Defendant / Appellee:
Jackson County, Mississippi, Mark Maples, Matthew Lott and others
Blair v. Lowerre
as 6:2023cv06420
Petitioner:
Nailon Blair
Respondent:
E. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
