Cases 51 - 60 of 2,365
William Cummings v. Thomas McGinley, et al
as 24-1082
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS
Defendant:
THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, Deputy Superintendent, CHRISTOPHER SYMONS, Deputy Superintendent, C.O. LUKE ERDMAN and others
Washington v. Rojas et al
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Dawone Washington
Defendant:
Warden Rojas, Officer Calvin, Unknown Black Female and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Iowa et al
as 6:2024cv02003
Plaintiff:
Lanard Antonio Collins
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Black Hawk County and Black Hawk County, Iowa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
as 5:2024hc02008
Petitioner:
Martinez Orlandis Black
Respondent:
North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cain v. Cross et al
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Ofc Cross, Calloway County, WKCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Black Rose Auto
as 6:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Black Rose Auto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carstarphen v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Andre Maurice Carstarphen, Jr.
Defendant:
Noah Price Oliver, Q. Brown, Level Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. Black
as 5:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Keith R. Cooper
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOVE v. MACON STATE PRISON, et al
as 5:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LOVE
Defendant:
MACON STATE PRISON, WARDEN MCDANIEL, SPECIAL AGENT WILLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Cooper
as 3:2023cv00899
Petitioner:
Martinez Orlandis Black
Respondent:
Billy Cooper
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
