Cases 51 - 60 of 10,348
Joe v. Marlboro County Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2024cv01206
Plaintiff:
Eldred Maliek Joe
Defendant:
Marlboro County Sheriff's Office and Morgan Eldridge Ridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Solly v. Hoying et al
as 2:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Solly
Defendant:
Lisa Hoying, Annette Chambers-Smith, Glenn Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gopshes v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00854
Petitioner:
Cokie Joe Gopshes, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Judge William V. Tucker and Clerk of Court Wayne Robery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morin et al v. Gray et al
as 1:2024cv10648
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Morin, Raymond Boissonault and Shawn Inglis
Defendant:
Dean Gray and Joe Ayala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnathan Wheeler v. Joe Williams, et al
as 24-11520
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN ALLEN WHEELER
Defendant:
JOE WILLIAMS, GREGORY DAVIS, DEREK CLUPPER and others
Warren v. Estes
as 3:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Warren
Defendant:
Mindy Estes
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01101
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant:
BOP and SCFO - TDCJ Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caraffa #350727 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Joe W. Jean-Louis v. Mayor Los Angeles Calif
as 2:2024cv03621
Plaintiff:
Joe W. Jean-Louis
Defendant:
Mayor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
