Cases 51 - 60 of 551
Barnette v. Hill et al
as 7:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Christine Barnette
Defendant:
Daniel Hill, Sarah Thompson and Daniel M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields #257135 v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
Handson Eugene Fields, Jr.
Defendant:
Cody M Smith and Shawn A Caziarc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Watson et al
as 2:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jarell D Terry
Defendant:
Levy Watson, Cameron Moore, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Virgil Green v. M. Smith, et al
as 22-1658
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIRGIL R. GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
M. SMITH, Custody Officer for MSI Garment Factory, D. PELLER, Classification Director and S. THOMPSON, RUM
ALSTON v. LITTLE
as 1:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
HAFEES ALSTON
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, DERRICK B. OBERLANDER, N.P. SUTHERLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Leu et al
as 3:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Smith
Defendant:
Mr. Leu, Ms. Carmona and Mrs. Essex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Fain v. Smith et al
as 7:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
William David Fain
Defendant:
Sherriff Daniel M. Smith, RN Daniel Hill, Lt. Nick Pennelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bozeman v. Smith
as 3:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
David Bozeman
Defendant:
C/O M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Woods et al
as 0:2022cv01618
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Smith
Defendant:
Lt. Woods, Sgt. Brooks, David Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Smith v. Leu et al
as 3:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Smith
Defendant:
Mr. Leu, Ms. Carmona and Mrs. Essex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
