Cases 51 - 60 of 4,895
Khan v. Presley et al
as 5:2024cv03905
Defendant:
Jenee Reed, M. Botello, D. Metcalf and others
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teryaeva-Reed v. Peters et al
as 4:2024cv03910
Defendant:
Melissa Rios-Marques, Colette S. Peters, Kathleen Tommey and others
Plaintiff:
Julia Teryaeva-Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00726
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Rodney Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tracey Grady v. Eddie Cathey
as 24-6625
Defendant:
FNU REED, Officer, EDDIE CATHEY, Sheriff, FNU DRAKE, Officer and others
Plaintiff:
TRACEY TERRELL GRADY
Reed v. Rivas et al
as 2:2024cv01161
Defendant:
Symour Omandac and Rivas
Plaintiff:
Demario Edward Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. USA
as 3:2024cv01580
Petitioner:
Phillip Reed
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
REED v. SHAFFER
as 1:2024cv01890
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Respondent:
BRIAN SHAFFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pitts v. Forrest County, et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Defendant:
Shane Lamar Boyle, Forrest County, Officer Jason Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewitt Pitts
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. AINSLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00907
Defendant:
C.O. PERKINS, C.O. JOHN DOE 3, C.O. KNIZER and others
Plaintiff:
JALIL S. REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv00529
Defendant:
Joseph Gorman, Lafayette Woods, Jr, Greg Kerstein and others
Plaintiff:
Norris B Howard, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
