Cases 61 - 70 of 2,703
Curry, Jr. v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv03144
Petitioner:
George Thomas Curry, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
Currie v. USA
as 3:2023cv01865
Petitioner:
Marshall James Currie
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Curry v. Cutt et al
as 2:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Brittany Samantha Curry
Defendant:
David Cutt, Joey Runyon, Angela Mesmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRIE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00660
Petitioner:
EMANUEL CURRIE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ridgley v. Currie
as 4:2023cv02770
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ridgley
Defendant:
Tammy Currie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Shelton et al
as 6:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Donnel J. Shelton
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Sheriff Craig Shelton, Officer Anthony Garza and Dist. Attorney Tonda Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Cogburn et al
as 3:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
Max O. Cogburn, David Cayer, David Keesler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Thornell
as 3:2023cv08507
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Curry
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiley v. Green, et al
as 0:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Allen Wiley II and Allen Wiley, III
Defendant:
David Green, Nicholas Cleverger, Tyler Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kauffman #360639 v. Department of Child Safety et al
as 3:2023cv08128
Plaintiff:
Zion Z Kauffman and Luke Z Yochai-Adams-Trimmer
Defendant:
Department of Child Safety, Arizona, State of, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
