Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 158
Claybon v. Dallas County Criminal District Court No One We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv04046
Petitioner: Gregory Allen Claybon
Respondent: Dallas County Criminal District Court No One
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gregory Gant v. State of North Carolina
as 15-7916
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREGORY ALLEN GANT
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Gant v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2015ct03300
Plaintiff: Gregory Allen Gant
Defendant: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. United States of America
as 4:2015cv00428
Petitioner: Gregory Allen Jennings
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ward v. Conway et al
as 1:2015cv02598
Petitioner: Gregory Allen Ward
Respondent: Butch Conway, Warren Davis and Danny Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Day v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2015cv00201
Petitioner: Gregory Allen Day
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bradford v. Mata et al
as 3:2015cv00070
Defendant: Gregory Allen, Paul Mata and Sergio Salcido
Plaintiff: Lloyd Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bussie et al v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2015cv00041
Petitioner: Anthony Bussie, Jimmie O Beasley, Armando Roberto Aros and others
Respondent: Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona State Prison Complex, Tucson, Richard G Renzi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniels v. Merritt et al
as 6:2015cv03040
Plaintiff: Gregory Allen Daniels, Jr
Defendant: Wayne Merritt and Ralph Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Rahming (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00028
Plaintiff: Gregory Allen
Defendant: Dr. Rahming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?