Cases 61 - 70 of 1,614
Beal v. Wynch
as 2:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Steve Beal
Defendant:
Josh Wynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALDONADO v. EMMONS et al
as 5:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
PABLO F MALDONADO
Defendant:
WARDEN EMMONS, MAJOR JOHN DOE, OFFICER ALFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerly v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Defendant:
State of Idaho, OC Josh Tewalt, Brett Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrington v. Thomas et al
as 6:2023cv06134
Plaintiff:
Robert Lane Herrington
Defendant:
Sheriff Neal Thomas, Jail Admin #1 Russ Carmack, Jail Admin #2 Brett Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demetrius Wade v. Celeste Blodgett, et al
as 23-3339
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS WADE
Defendant / Appellee:
CELESTE BLODGETT, JOSH SAPP and RYAN SNYDER
SATTERFIELD v. MCCADDAMS et al
as 1:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
HOLLIE MCCADDAMS, MERILYN P. NEWELL, JOSH STEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macias v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Ryan Macias
Defendant:
State of Oregon, DOC, Warren G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARVEY v. SHAPIRO
as 2:2023cv04539
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HARVERY and WILLIAM HARVEY
Respondent:
JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Storm v. McClusky et al
as 1:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Rick Storm and Rickie Storm
Defendant:
David McClusky, Dodds Hayden, Karen Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foley v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Joseph Foley
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Corrections, John Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
