Cases 71 - 80 of 15,778
Raleigh v. Mack et al
as 9:2024cv00953
Defendant:
CO Matthew H. Orchard, CO Michael T. Mack, CO John Does #1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Kurtis Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Virgil v. DeYoung et al
as 2:2024cv00973
Defendant:
Shelrie Wilson, R Frias, C Hinz and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lamont Virgil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Jones v. Amber Lineberry, et al
as 24-5684
Plaintiff:
DANIEL H. JONES
Defendant:
BOARD OF PAROLE, Parole Hearings Division and AMBER LINEBERRY, Parole Administrator
Nellon v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02141
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Arkeem H. Nellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alogaili v. Clark et al
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Hasan Alogaili
Defendant:
H. Clark, FNU Moss and FNU Hilton
Unknown:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Castle et al
as 4:2024cv00640
Defendant:
Zachary Dilliard, Cody Castle, Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Clay et al
as 4:2024cv04569
Defendant:
Robert A Gusman, Jeffrey A. Thompson, Clair Maier and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11951
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Whatley v. Bullard et al
as 5:2024ct03183
Defendant:
Unit Manager Green, Jamie Bullard, Kimberly D. Grande and others
Plaintiff:
Quanterious Hommie Whatley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagood v. Pritchett et al
as 6:2024cv04190
Plaintiff:
Terrance Terrell Hagood
Defendant:
Shawn L Pritchett and William H Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
