Cases 71 - 80 of 1,818
Mullet v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv01902
Petitioner:
Michael Duane Mullet and Michael D Mullet
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Ochala
as 5:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
Duane E. Perry
Defendant:
M. Ochala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strain v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Strain
Defendant:
Filipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Duane v. Martinez
as 5:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane
Defendant:
Filipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pyndell v. George et al
as 1:2023cv01209
Plaintiff:
Keith Pyndell
Defendant:
Benjamin George, Loconti, Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffy, Sr. v. Lewis et al
as 2:2023cv04484
Plaintiff:
Marlin Elrico Coffy, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Duane Lewis and Berkeley County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. Lewis et al
as 4:2023cv04483
Plaintiff:
Marquise Deronante Simmons
Defendant:
Sheriff Duane Lewis, Berkeley County Sheriff's Office, Major Tony Phyall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2023cv17721
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lokken v. Warden Lino Lakes et al
as 0:2023cv02714
Petitioner:
Shawn Duane Lokken
Respondent:
Warden Lino Lakes and DOC Lino-Lakes Prizon Medical Department/ Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZACK v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DUANE ZACK, III
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
