Cases 71 - 80 of 1,020
Stump et al v. Marshall et al
as 1:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jedadiah Stump and Adonnis Shephard
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, III, R. S. Mutter, Curtis Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDOWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00044
Petitioner:
DIMORIO MCDOWELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Saul Bruce Preciado v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv00769
Petitioner:
Saul Bruce Preciado
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDowell v. South Carolina Department of Public Safety et al
as 4:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Gregory McDowell
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Public Safety and Brendan Delaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sandlain v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00103
Petitioner:
Blake Sandlain
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden, Eric Rokosky, James White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Syner v. McDowell County Commission et al
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
John D. Syner
Defendant:
McDowell County Commission and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deshawn Chappell v.N. McDowell et al
as 5:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Chappell
Defendant:
N. McDowell, S. Lopez, N. Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Powell #258660 v. Brown et al
as 2:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Shannon Powell #258660
Defendant:
M. Brown, Unknown McDowell and Unknown Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Daniels v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv00080
Petitioner:
Jason Daniels
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
