Cases 71 - 80 of 3,895
Murphy v. Owens
as 1:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Andrew Thurston Murphy
Respondent:
Craig D. Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Officer Kopps
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Murphy
Defendant:
Officer Kopps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Steven Murphy
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Jon Loftus and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy #769317 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Anthony Murphy #769317
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E. Washington, Unknown Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Carter v. Murphy et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Nathanael James Carter, Jr
Defendant:
D. Murphy, Hayne, C. Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. Murphy
as 4:2024cv40005
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Carolyn Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Felix Murphy, III
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CURDO v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CURDO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., JACLYN CASEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORMAN v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE HOWARD FORMAN
Defendant:
NURSE MURPHY, NURSE PITTS and DECATUR COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akinlawon v. Mayo et al
as 9:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Ayotunji Akinlawon
Defendant:
Gregory D. Mayo, Oneil, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
