Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,096
Otis v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00075
Petitioner: Kerron L Otis
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Bruner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00138
Plaintiff: Michael Otis Robertson
Defendant: D Bruner and Eric Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00127
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mays v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff: Otis Mays
Defendant: Johnson, Moreno, Heckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greer v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00089
Petitioner: Otis Greer
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. HALLMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00268
Plaintiff: KARLESTER YOUNG
Defendant: KIP HALLMAN, PAUL NOEL, JOHN OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Otis Lee Rodgers v. State of California
as 5:2022cv02224
Petitioner: Otis Lee Rodgers, Sr. and Otis Lee Rodgers, Sr
Respondent: State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arrington v. Epperson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv04161
Plaintiff: Otis Arrington
Defendant: William Epperson, P. Lodge, A Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Story et al
as 1:2022cv06265
Plaintiff: Micah Anderson
Defendant: Otis L Story and Dennis Deer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Otis Sutton
as 22-7250
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: OTIS SUTTON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?