Cases 71 - 80 of 11,357
Clardy v. Banks et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Defendant:
Virginia Dept. of Corrections, Juanece Banks, Frederick Russell and others
Plaintiff:
MarQui Clardy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deans v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Donshea O. Deans, Sr.
Defendant:
Mark E. Engelke, R. Brock, Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00931
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Torrence Harris, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Nutt v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
John Nutt, Sr
Defendant:
Barry Hyde, Nelson and Eric Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alphonso Bell v. Brown
as 24-6703
Defendant:
CONTROL, Control Worker, BROWN, Lt. Deputy and GREEN, Deputy Sheriff
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO BELL, SR.
Williams v. Lumpkin
as 24-20318
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Jaylan Rochard Williams, Sr.
Broyles v. USA
as 3:2024cv00669
Petitioner:
Daniel Thomas Broyles, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lomax v. Najera et al
as 2:2024cv01344
Defendant:
Kaufman, Gabriela Najera and Brian Williams Sr.
Plaintiff:
Nathan L. Lomax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Shove v. State of California
as 2:2024cv01976
Respondent:
State of California
Petitioner:
Theodore Churchill Shove, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pelletier v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00218
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Pelletier, Sr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
