Cases 81 - 90 of 769
PULLIAM v. USA
as 1:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
JODY LEE PULLIAM, JR.
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Block v. Fikes et al
as 0:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Waylen Block
Defendant:
J Fikes, Acting Warden, Amy Boucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Block v. Boncher et al
as 1:2023cv10141
Plaintiff:
Waylen Block
Defendant:
Amy Boncher, Sincada, Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aigbekaen v. Hightower et al
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Raymond Aigbekaen
Defendant:
Warden Hightower, Dr. Rabinowitz, HSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GRIFFITH v. BOP
as 1:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
RICHARD LEE GRIFFITH
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tatar v. Griffin et al
as 2:2023cv02023
Defendant:
CMC Johnson, STA Zebtaski, Edu Officer (F/N/U) Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Serdar Tatar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Marcus Stewart
Defendant:
"BOP" Dire Colette Peters, United States of America and Colette Peters
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Prigmore v. FCI Beaumont
as 23-40002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Prigmore
Defendant / Appellee:
FCI Beaumont Staff, Bryan K. Dobbs, Multiple Unknown Agents of the BOP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hernandez v. Bureau of Prisons (BOP) et al
as 3:2022cv00725
Plaintiff:
Pedro Perez Hernandez
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
