Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 186
BURNS v. DANIELS
as 1:2016cv01017
Petitioner: JOHN LEE BURNS
Respondent: FAYE DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bryant v. USA
as 1:2016cv00112
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: JOHN LEE BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ADAMS v. USA
as 1:2016cv01564
Petitioner: JOHN LEE ADAMS, III
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jordan v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00457
Petitioner: John Lee Jordan
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03053
Plaintiff: JOHN LEE HILL
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lee v. Louisiana State Penitentiary Angola et al
as 3:2016cv00368
Respondent: Jeff Landry and Louisiana State Penitentiary Angola
Petitioner: John Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cortright v. Genesee County et al
as 1:2016cv00441
Plaintiff: John Lee Cortright, Jr.
Defendant: Genesee County, Robert C. Noonan, Mary Lou Strathearn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Roane v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-20281
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN LEE ROANE
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
John Johnson v. Lorie Davis, Director We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-10518
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN LEE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Thomas v. Stephen
as 1:2016cv00066
Petitioner: John Lee Thomas
Respondent: William Stephen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?