Cases 81 - 90 of 160
Lewis v. Davis
as 6:2016cv00035
Petitioner:
Michael Lewis
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HUX v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2016cv00187
Defendant:
COUNTY OF VIGO, MICHAEL LEWIS and VIGO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ROOM #6
Plaintiff:
SHANE M. HUX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. WRIGHT et al
as 2:2016cv00184
Defendant:
MICHAEL LEWIS and MICHAEL WRIGHT
Plaintiff:
RYAN DAMONE MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arron Lewis v. Charles Holladay, et al
as 16-2202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Arron Michael Lewis
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles Holladay, "Doc" Sheriff, Pulaski COunty Sheriff's Department, Carl Johnson, M.D., Doctor, Pulaski County Jail, Sarah Speer, Registered Nurse, Pulaski County Jail and others
Ivory v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv08035
Petitioner:
Michael Lewis Ivory, .
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lewis v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv04560
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Riverdale Police Department, Markham County State Prosecutors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMBERT et al v. GRISBY et al
as 1:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT, ANTHONY R. JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00108
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Kelley et al
as 5:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
Arron Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Dale Reed, Marvin Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00025
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
