Cases 1 - 10 of 3,857
Bailey v. Core Civic
as 3:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
Jamie Bailey
Defendant:
Core Civic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. VA DOC et al
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
VA DOC, Kyle Rosch, Mack Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Carroll et al
as 1:2024cv01971
Plaintiff:
James Muhammad
Defendant:
Judge Tracy Carroll, Officer Hall, Officer Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Bailey v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Meyers v. Bailey
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Warden Mack Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davison v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv01443
Plaintiff:
Terell Davison
Defendant:
Carothers Bailey, Mark Williams and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crafton v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Crafton
Defendant:
Wendy Davis, Bailey Goodwin, Timothy Stucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridgley et al v. Bailey
as 1:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
John Ridgley and Brandon Sweetman
Defendant:
Warden and William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Jesse Leonard Massey
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Springfield Police Department and multiple unknown officers, City of Springfield, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
James Robert Bailey
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
