Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Young v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2023cv03505
Petitioner:
MonQuez J. Young
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden of Livesay Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Foster v. Warden of Livesay Correctional Institution
as 23-6143
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE FOSTER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN OF LIVESAY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Robinson et al v. Wells Fargo et al
as 4:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Denny L. Robinson, Gustavo Amaro, Angel Obregon and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, Albert Yagubyan, Artashes Darbinyan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. State of South Carolina
as 9:2021cv03332
Plaintiff:
Robert L Foster
Defendant:
State of South Carolina
Respondent:
Warden of Livesay Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Velasquez v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2021cv02742
Petitioner:
Derrick Velasquez
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden Livesay Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Livesay v. USA
as 3:2019cv00390
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jimmy Dean Livesay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WALKER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2019cv02769
Plaintiff:
VICTOR JOHNSON, KENNETH WATKINS, JERICUO MISSOURI and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack West, Jr. v. Psychologist D. Livesay et al
as 2:2019cv07190
Defendant:
Psychologist D. Livesay, Correctional Officer Yslas and Correctional Officer Garica
Plaintiff:
Mack West, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damien Johnson v. Warden
as 17-7315
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAMIEN O. JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, Livesay Correctional Institution
LIVESAY V. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2017cv00104
Petitioner:
JUSTIN MATTHEW LIVESAY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA GUILFORD COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
