Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Gaillard v. Odham et al
as 5:2023ct03154
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gaillard
Defendant:
Jeffrey Odham, Lewis B. Leonard, P. Robinett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, L Kaiser and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McChristian v. Neal et al
as 3:2021cv00043
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Internal Investigator, Pam Banes and others
Plaintiff:
Boyd McChristian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2020cv06483
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, R C Younger and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Leonard et al
as 3:2020cv00509
Plaintiff:
Dante Guy and Dante D Guy
Defendant:
Ron Neal and B Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. Russell County Sheriff's Office et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2018cv00985
Defendant:
S. Parker and Russell County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
William B. Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jack Allen v. USA, et al
as 17-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK E. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SOLICITOR GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
ALLEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
JACK E. ALLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC HOLDER, LORETTA LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monroe v. Dunlap et al
as 1:2015cv01944
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Monroe
Defendant:
Sgt. Longbons, Daniel A. Dunlap, B. Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shavaughn Wilson-El v. William Wilson, et al
as 14-1324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAVAUGHN C. WILSON-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM K. WILSON, Superintendent, TIMOTHY TIBBS, DYLAN CABANAW and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
