Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Rogers v. Howard et al
as 3:2023cv05806
Plaintiff:
Daryl C Rogers
Defendant:
Timothy Howard, James Jolly, Aaron Arias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01879
Plaintiff:
Robert C Rogers
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony v. Fisher et al
as 1:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Romel Damon Anthony
Defendant:
R. Fisher, R. Thompson, D. Betz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rogers v. Mail Department
as 3:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
Robert C Rogers
Defendant:
Mail Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Payne et al
as 3:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Don Michael Cox
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, III, John Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benton v. Payne et al
as 3:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Benny Benton
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, III, John Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Payne et al
as 3:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Shane Price
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, III, John Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tumbusch v. Spartanburg County Detention Center et al
as 4:2022cv01949
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ann Tumbusch
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Detention Center, Spartanburg County, C. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bryant v. Pedro et al
as 6:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jerome Bryant
Defendant:
Officer Olayinka M Pedro, Sgt William C Rogers, Sgt Christopher J Helmig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel C. Rogers v. State of CA, et al
as 2:2020cv08809
Petitioner:
Samuel C. Rogers
Respondent:
State of California, Carol Rose and Steve Cooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
