Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Troka v. McCown et al
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ethan Troka
Defendant:
Patrick McCown, North Central Unit Chaple, Jeffery Batson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Jesse Leonard Massey
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Springfield Police Department and multiple unknown officers, City of Springfield, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Heimbuck et al
as 4:2022cv03024
Plaintiff:
Christopher Powell
Defendant:
Christopher Heimbuck, Anny Andrade, Adrian Amonett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. United States of America
as 8:2020cv02968
Petitioner:
Christopher Powell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Powell v. Arnoldussen et al
as 2:2020cv02185
Defendant:
Deputy Arnoldussen, Corporal Risley and John or Jane Doe Nurses
Plaintiff:
Terence Christopher Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Rogers et al
as 2:2020cv02133
Defendant:
Deputy Sammy Rogers and Officer Judkins
Plaintiff:
Terence Christopher Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison et al v. Central Mississippi Correction Facility et al
as 3:2020cv00291
Defendant:
Tommy Taylor, Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC), Central Mississippi Correction Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jamison and Christopher Powell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Johnson et al
as 4:2019cv00917
Defendant:
Brian Johnson and Charley Reid
Plaintiff:
Christopher Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benavidez v. Solberg et al
as 2:2018cv02849
Defendant:
Erich Kinney, Justin Solberg, Christopher Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Joe I Benavidez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. USA
as 1:2016cv01222
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
