Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Deaton v. Diaz et al
as 5:2024cv04328
Plaintiff:
Herbert Nathaniel Deaton
Defendant:
Jose Diaz, James Quanico and City and County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen et al v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2024cv01490
Defendant:
Tyler Regester, Joe Guajardo, Chase Osmonson and others
Plaintiff:
Damion Ray Allen, Michael Ray Allen, III and Raymond Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISENHOWER v. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE et al
as 1:2023cv02228
Plaintiff:
BRIAN RUSSELL ISENHOWER
Defendant:
QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE, NEIL PROPST, LORA DEATON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adaway v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv01660
Plaintiff:
Sharun Adaway, Jr.
Defendant:
Anne Precythe, CO I Unknown Spain, CO I Unknown Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deaton v. S.C.D.C et al
as 2:2023cv04298
Plaintiff:
William H Deaton
Defendant:
S.C.D.C, Broad River Correctional Institution, Unkknown S.C.D.C. Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deaton v. LCSD Dispatch
as 3:2023cv03750
Plaintiff:
William Deaton
Defendant:
Lexington County Detention Center, Dispatch, Other Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deaton v. Short et al
as 2:2023cv03322
Plaintiff:
William Harper Deaton
Defendant:
Officer Short and L.C.D.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Deaton v. Jenny Hildebrand
as 23-3281
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES A. DEATON
Respondent / Appellee:
JENNY HILDEBRAND, Warden
Burns v. Deaton
as 4:2023cv04013
Plaintiff:
Terry Burns
Defendant:
Warden Deaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Deaton v. Warden Tom Schweitzer, et al.
as 3:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
James A. Deaton
Defendant:
Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
