Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Sedillo v. Summit Foods Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Gilbert J Sedillo, Jr.
Defendant:
Summit Foods Inc., Roseanne Otero, Brittany Mayer-Schuler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LoRusso v. Smithfield Foods Inc.
as 3:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony LoRusso
Defendant:
Smithfield Foods Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Ezell et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Johnny Haynes
Defendant:
Mike Ezell, Tyrone Nelson, Summit Foods Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVER v. ARAMARK FOOD INC. et al
as 5:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
BRIAN C. OLIVER
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD INC., ARAMARK SUPERVISOR TASSONE, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs v. Fields et al
as 2:2021cv00073
Defendant:
John Varnado doing business as Trinity Foods, Inc., Marc L. Fields and Kenton County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Adam Combs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. Mars/Wrigley Confectionary et al
as 2:2020cv01664
Defendant:
Mars/Wrigley Confectionary, Four In One and Abimar Foods Inc
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cervantes v. Fowler Foods Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00237
Plaintiff:
Michael Cervantes
Defendant:
Fowler Foods Inc and Chris Fowler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heil v. Baltimore Co.-B.C.D.C et al
as 1:2020cv02268
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Baltimore Co.-B.C.D.C, Aramark Food, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Heath Roy Heil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jones v. Baltimore Co. B.C.D.C. et al
as 1:2020cv02270
Defendant:
Baltimore Co. B.C.D.C., PrimeCare Health Inc. and Aramark Food, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jahiem J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
