Cases 1 - 10 of 2,081
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. USA et al
as 0:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Glenn Miller
Defendant:
USA, Officer Hunt and Officer Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goods v. Daley et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
James A. Daley, Deputy Turner, Deputy Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANGHAM v. HUNT
as 5:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
BRYAN DALE LANGHAM
Defendant:
DR CYNTHIA HUNT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasniak v. Arnette et al
as 3:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jasniak
Defendant:
Aaron Arnette, Trevor Milleson, Robert Kirchner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Floyd O. Hunt, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00463
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
White v. King County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Killian White
Defendant:
King County Sheriff's Office, Tyler Hunt, Jeffrey Petrenchak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flesch v. Malcomb et al
as 6:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Cody Joseph Vernon Flesch
Defendant:
Kimberly Malcomb, Travis Jones and Ray Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #443755 v. Hunt
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Fredricks Smith #443755
Defendant:
Unknown Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
