Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Fred Dorton v. Daisy Lee Sterkel et al
as 2:2024cv03603
Plaintiff:
Fred Dorton
Defendant:
Daisy Lee Sterkel, J. Fernandez, D. Moranville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FERNANDEZ v. JOHNSON et al
as 4:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
DR JOHNSON, RICKY DIXON, ARMOR CONTRACTED BY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Splawn et al
as 1:2023cv03014
Plaintiff:
Zachary Lee Barrett
Defendant:
Chief Bill Splawn, Lt C Freeburg, Ernest Coxen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darryl Hudson v. C. Pfeiffer, et al
as 22-17002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRYL W. HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
C. PFEIFFER, Warden, R. COX, J. DIAZ and others
Nicholas Stone v. T. Robinson, et al
as 22-16587
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS SCOTT STONE
Defendant / Appellee:
T. ROBINSON, Y. YANG, LVN, R. DAVID and others
Anant Tripati v. Wexford Health Sources Inc., et al
as 22-1861
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC, MATTHEW R. ZWICK, SAMUEL H. FORMAN and others
Fernandez v. Duarte et al
as 3:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
Frank J. Fernandez
Defendant:
Duarte, -, R. Madden, J. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWBERG v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. NEWBERG and DANIEL NEWBERG
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPT. JAMES SORBER, STEPHEN WIENER, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murrell v. Adams et al
as 2:2021cv01633
Plaintiff:
Antony T Murrell, Jr.
Defendant:
Karanga Grace Adams, Debra Larson, Centurion of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Jones et al
as 2:2021cv02493
Plaintiff:
Sacorey Clark
Defendant:
K. Jones, A. Arias, Mr. Childress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
