Cases 1 - 10 of 15
French v. Montgomery et al
as 9:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Darren French and Daren French
Defendant:
J. Montgomery, Sgt. Extrand, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deshawn Chappell v.N. McDowell et al
as 5:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Chappell
Defendant:
N. McDowell, S. Lopez, N. Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uren v. Maze et al
as 3:2022cv03049
Plaintiff:
Bradley Thomas Uren
Defendant:
Sgt. T. Maze, Sgt. C. Maple, Sgt. K. James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chappell v. McDowell et al
as 3:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Chappell
Defendant:
N. McDowell, S. Lopez, N. Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Lindley et al
as 9:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Anita Lindley, Ernestine Julye, Laurie J Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ahjeeb Jamal Boyd Jr. v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2021cv05616
Plaintiff:
Ahjeeb Jamal Boyd, Jr.
Defendant:
Neil McDowell, E. Winbush, F. Duenas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Lolley et al
as 1:2018cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jesse J. Montgomery
Defendant:
M. Lolley, Darrin Whitaker and Nichlus Newell
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Laney v. Bush et al
as 9:2017cv02322
Plaintiff:
Michael James Laney
Defendant:
Dennis Bush, Lt Walker, NFN Olds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Thompson et al
as 4:2015cv00014
Defendant:
J Montgomery, Matthew D. Nace, Reeves County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talbert v. Montgomer et al
as 4:2014cv00063
Defendant:
Lt B Garcia, OPR Investigator Priscilla Miles, J Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Talbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
