Cases 1 - 10 of 525
Huffman v. Close et al
as 4:2024cv01421
Respondent:
David Close and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Petitioner:
James Lee Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nicholas v. Fairmont State Police (Marion)
as 3:2024cv00087
Defendant:
Fairmont State Police (Marion)
Plaintiff:
James Lee Nicholas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garver v. Baker County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv00678
Defendant:
Baker County Sheriff, Duval County EMS Flight, Baker County EMS and others
Plaintiff:
James Lee Garver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Elkins et al
as 3:2024cv00115
Defendant:
Debbie Burlson and Darrell Elkins
Plaintiff:
James Lee Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Elkins et al
as 5:2024cv05134
Plaintiff:
James Lee Woods
Defendant:
Debbie Burlson and Darrell Elkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas v. White et al
as 2:2024cv00308
Defendant:
Ron White and Josha Dowing
Plaintiff:
James Lee Nicholas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sueing #107626 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01447
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
James Lee Sueing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Cobb, III v. USA
as 24-11264
Petitioner:
JAMES LEE COBB, III
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cecil v. Novak
as 7:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Defendant:
Wellpath Health Services and Dr. Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Florence County Sheriff's Dept et al
as 5:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Muhammad, Rasheed Abdullah Muhammad and James Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Florence County Sheriff's Dept, Florence County Detention Ctr and Ofc Ms McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
