Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Greene v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv05228
Defendant:
Superintendent Marlyn Kopp, C.O. K. Barnes and Daniel F. Martuscello
Plaintiff:
Terrance Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordoba v. Rodriguez et al
as 7:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cordoba
Defendant:
Correction Officer A. Rodriguez, Correction Officer K. Barnes, Correction Officer L. Maldalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dent v. Leadbetter et al
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Robert Dent
Defendant:
John Leadbetter, Randy Walker, C. Speth and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. Harris et al
as 2:2022cv02262
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
Scott . Harris, Clayton R Higgins, Jr, United States Supreme Court Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Hill v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2020cv00603
Defendant:
J Rogers, Unknown Perry, L Tijerina and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Dwayne Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PINNEY v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
as 1:2019cv03842
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN PINNEY
Defendant:
ROBERT K BARNES, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and ROBERT K. BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinney v. United States Supreme Court
as 4:2019cv00930
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Pinney
Defendant:
United States Supreme Court and Robert K Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simuel v. Harris et al
as 5:2019ct03017
Defendant:
Lisa Nesbitt, Scott S. Harris and Redmond K. Barnes
Plaintiff:
Dontez Lamont Simuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawndell Monte McFarlin v. Scott S. Harris
as 18-6095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWNDELL MONTE MCFARLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT S. HARRIS and REDMOND K. BARNES
McFarlin v. Harris et al
as 2:2017cv03215
Plaintiff:
Shawndell Monte McFarlin
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris and Redmond K Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
