Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Roberts v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00922
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Marquita McCullough, Michael McCall and others
Plaintiff:
Jadarius K. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taplin, Jr. v. Watson et al
as 3:2019cv01123
Defendant:
J. Loche, Price, Counselor Inbaden and others
Plaintiff:
Enos F. Taplin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faruq v. Morgan County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2019cv04114
Defendant:
Jennifer Unknown, Morgan County Sheriff's Department, K Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Khalifah A M Faruq
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graydon v. Maruf et al
as 4:2018cv00360
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Graydon
Defendant:
L Maruf, K Roberts, Bone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07198
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. ROBERTS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Little et al
as 1:2016cv00198
Plaintiff:
Arthur Moore
Defendant:
Little, K. Roberts and Kyle Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Smith et al
as 2:2013cv00242
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Roberts
Defendant:
Judd Smith and Chad Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Roberts et al
as 1:2010cv00445
Plaintiff:
Darren L James, Sr
Defendant:
K Roberts, C Chaves and Curry County Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuckra v. Roberts et al
as 3:2008cv00262
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shuckra
Defendant:
Daryl K. Roberts, Neil Dryfe, Jose L. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muscolino v. Landrum, et al
as 07-60558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MUSCOLINO
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL LANDRUM, Internal Affairs Investigator, in his individual and official capacity, SHERRY MAGGITT, Disciplinary Committee, in her individual and official capacity, ANNE PERKINS, Disciplinary Committee Chairperson, in her individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
