Cases 1 - 10 of 153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vass v. McCelland et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jamal Leslie Vass, Redbull, Neptune and others
Defendant:
Jeffery McCelland, Gina Bennett, Ashley D. Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. USA
as 2:2024cv10392
Petitioner:
Terry L. Scott, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tyrone Scott v. Wayne Holdon, Jr., et al
as 24-1039
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Scott
Defendant:
Wayne Holdon, Jr., DEA, Officer, Miller County Detention Center, Rick Dodd, Retired DEA, Wayne Holding Co. and others
HILL v. SCOTT
as 3:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HILL
Defendant:
COREY L. SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Holdon et al
as 4:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L Scott
Defendant:
Wayne Holdon, Jr, Rick Dodd, Wayne Holding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Malone et al
as 2:2023cv03532
Plaintiff:
Antwon L. Scott
Defendant:
Dan Malone and Tanya M. Duby-Gritzuk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott (PS) v. Executive Director of CDOC
as 1:2023cv01802
Petitioner:
Darian L. Scott
Respondent:
Executive Director of CDOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2023cv02800
Petitioner:
Antwan L. Scott
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Director Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
