Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Garrett v. Harris County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Garrett
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Fort Bend County Jail
as 1:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Garrett
Defendant:
Fort Bend County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Garrett
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jefferson Co. Corr. Facility, Corrhealth L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littleton v. Parson et al
as 6:2023cv03367
Plaintiff:
Davoyn Littleton and Dawoyn Littleton
Defendant:
Mike Parson, Missouri Probation and Parole Board, Michele Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett #162243 v. Worthy
as 1:2020cv00742
Plaintiff:
Albert Lee Garrett #162243, Jr.
Defendant:
Kim L. Worthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett #162243 v. Davids
as 1:2020cv00552
Respondent:
John Davids
Petitioner:
Albert Lee Garrett #162243, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garrett v. Spaulding
as 1:2018cv11731
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Petitioner:
Wilson Lee Garrett, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Velthuysen #195606 et al v. Unknown Party #1 et al
as 2:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Velthuysen #195606
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2, Unknown Party #3 and others
Movant:
Paul Mullholland #484881, Anthony Tarone Hubbard #481211, Paul Turner #485092 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Wilson Lee Garrett, Jr.
as 17-6883
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILSON LEE GARRETT, JR.
Garrett v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Gurney Lee Garrett
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
