Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Williams v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv00909
Petitioner:
Michael D. Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Price v. Kentucky Department of Corrections Commissioner et al
as 4:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Price
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections Commissioner, Kentucky Department of Corrections Deputy Commissioner, Aaron Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Kentucky Department of Corrections Commissioner et al
as 3:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Price
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections Commissioner, Kentucky Department of Corrections Deputy Commissioner, Aaron Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hale et al
as 2:2014cv01411
Plaintiff:
Michael D Williams
Defendant:
Mike Hale, Miller, David Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitfield v. Althoff et al
as 3:2013cv03192
Plaintiff:
BenyeHudah Whitfield
Defendant:
Eric Althoff, Angie Blackman-Donnovan, Craig Findley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. DCC-Douglas Co. Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv00007
Defendant:
Brenda, DCC-Douglas Co. Corrections, Michelle and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2011cv00165
Petitioner:
Michael D Williams
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Keller (INMATE3)
as 2:2009cv01039
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Williams
Defendant:
J. A. Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Michael Williams v. Robert Francis
as 09-10898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL D WILLIAMS, also known as Michael D Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT FRANCIS, Criminal District Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas
Williams v. Francis
as 3:2009cv01209
Plaintiff:
Michael D Williams
Defendant:
Robert Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
