Cases 1 - 10 of 13,750
Martin v. Burns
as 4:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Frederick Martin
Defendant:
Robert P. Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fine v. Dougherty et al
as 3:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
Paul Fine, Jr.
Defendant:
Dougherty, Grimaldi, Dow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. West et al
as 5:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick Bonner
Defendant:
John West, Asst Dir. Greg Martin, Dir. Robert Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cvikel v. Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility Security Staff et al
as 2:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Trayvon Cvikel
Defendant:
Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility Security Staff, Officer Martin and 8th Floor Unit Manager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ayala v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ayala
Defendant:
Martin, Moore, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cubic v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
Jose Cubic
Defendant:
Martin, Moore, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfeather v. Solly et al
as 8:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Solly, Nueyer, Kerri Paulson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Harrison
as 24-60238
Petitioner:
Clarence Martin
Respondent:
C. Harrison, Warden, Yazoo City Low
Hess #353733 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Greg John Hess
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Cochise, County of, Cochise County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOPEZ v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
MARTIN LOPEZ
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CASEY JACOBS-CAMPBELL and MIKAYLA WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
