Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Stanley, Tvories v. Palm Beach Sheriff's Office et al
as 9:2024cv80179
Plaintiff:
Tvories Stanley
Defendant:
Palm Beach Sheriff's Office, M. Brooks and Michael D. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Gutierrez
as 23-50323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael James Brooks
Defendant / Appellee:
David Gutierrez
Brooks v. Attorney General et al
as 4:2023cv01536
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Michael D Brooks and Michael Donta Brooks
Defendant:
Attorney General, Florence Clerk of Court and Joshua A Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Brooks v. Gutierrez
as 1:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Michael James Brooks
Defendant:
David Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Harris, Sr. v. J. Sadler
as 22-7262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNATHAN A. HARRIS, SR. and JONATHAN A. HARRIS, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
J. SADLER, Human Service Administrator, MICHAEL D. BROOKS, Ordering Physician/Attending Physician, S. HILL, L.P.N. and others
Harris v. Sadler et al
as 2:2020cv00451
Defendant:
J. Sadler, Beth E. Cabell, S. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan A. Harris, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks #290932 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv00963
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2018cv01767
Defendant:
Officer Erickson, Lt Artus, Nurse Amy and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks, Sr. v. USA
as 6:2018cv03287
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael William Brooks, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brooks v. Grant Food Store et al
as 3:2018cv00498
Defendant:
Grant Food Store and 7/11 Food Store
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
