Cases 1 - 10 of 1,846
Michael Goodson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11602
Petitioner:
MICHAEL D. GOODSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Molina v. Coble et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Herrado Jose Molina
Defendant:
Michael D Coble, Gabriel D Martinez and Brenda K Laster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dewey v. Jeffereys
as 4:2024cv03087
Petitioner:
Michael D. Dewey
Respondent:
Rob Jeffereys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman-Bey v. Hendrickson et al
as 6:2024cv03128
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Coleman-Bey
Defendant:
Michael D Hendrickson, Michael L. Parson, Jeffrey Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams #236300 v. Maleport et al
as 2:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Terry Wayne Williams #236300
Defendant:
Loretta Maleport, Cliff Shigwadja, James Corrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Porter v. Officer Lechner
as 24-6353
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. PORTER
Defendant:
OFFICER LECHNER, OFFICER SMITH and SERGEANT WILBURN
Corns v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2024ct03093
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Corns
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Sgt. Santifull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Michael D Johnson
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IVANCICH v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv04229
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID IVANCICH and MICHAEL D. IVANCICH
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JUSTIN PINTO, AHMED JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
