Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Williams v. Forrest County Mississippi et al
as 2:2020cv00169
Defendant:
Lt. Dale Bounds, Officer Harry Crockett, Forrest County Mississippi and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Morris Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Payne et al
as 4:2020cv01132
Defendant:
Stanley Payne, Sara Miller and Ted Eaton
Plaintiff:
Morris Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward et al v. Payne et al
as 4:2020cv01093
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ward and Morris Williams
Defendant:
Stanley Payne, Sara Miller and Ted Eaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Castro
as 3:2020cv01853
Petitioner:
Eddric Morris Williams
Respondent:
Warden Evelyn Castro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hyman v. Duffy et al
as 2:2015cv02086
Petitioner:
Morris William Hyman
Respondent:
Brian Duffy, Jefferey Beard, Charles M.M. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hyman v. Duffy et al
as 4:2015cv03681
Plaintiff:
Morris William Hyman
Defendant:
Brian Duffy, Jefferey Beard, Charles M.M. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris Williams v. Phares Hutton, et al
as 13-1053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PHARES HUTTON, Hom. Division, GEORGE ADAMSON, Deputy Coroner, J. PERPER, M.D. and others
WILLIAMS v. HUTTON et al
as 2:2012cv01582
Plaintiff:
MORRIS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PHARES HUTTON, GEORGE ADAMSON, J. PERPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States of America, The
as 4:2012cv08020
Petitioner:
Timothy Morris Williams
Respondent:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kerchee, et al v. Smith, et al
as 12-6080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN KERCHEE, JR. and DEBORAH SEQUICHIE-KERCHEE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK SMITH, Judge Comanche CO, WILLIAM C. RILEY, Comanche CO ADA, EMMIT TAYLOE, Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
