Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Rodriguez v. United State of America et al
as 1:2022cv11522
Plaintiff:
Omar Rodriguez
Defendant:
United State of America, MD Megan Shaw, Patricia Ruze, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredil Rodriguez Fuentes v. District Attorney Northumberland County, et al
as 22-2603
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDIL OMAR RODRIGUEZ FUENTES
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY, SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Ruiz v. Meza et al
as 2:2020cv02008
Defendant:
Jose Diaz De Leon Cruz, Rafael Coello Zetina, Claudia Marisol Lopez Galvez and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Stamford Police Dept
as 3:2020cv00023
Plaintiff:
Franklin Omar Rodriguez
Defendant:
Stamford Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez-Rivera v. Warden Adams
as 5:2019cv00282
Respondent:
Warden Adams
Petitioner:
Omar Rodriguez-Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez-Rivera v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv00147
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Omar Rodriguez-Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez Fuentes v. Overlander
as 3:2019cv01516
Petitioner:
Fredil Omar Rodriguez Fuentes
Respondent:
Overlander and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fuentes v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
as 3:2019cv01338
Petitioner:
Omar Rodriguez Fuentes and Fredil Omar Rodriguez-Fuentes
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General and Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RODRIGUEZ v. CLAFLIN
as 2:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
OMAR RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CLAFLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00168
Petitioner:
Omar Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
