Cases 1 - 10 of 17
McGranahan v. City of Hurricane et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Joseph McGranahan
Defendant:
City of Hurricane, Sergeant Poe, Officer Randall Justin Rakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BINGHAM v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2022cv02769
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA BINGHAM
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, SERGEANT PHILLIP KLINGER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MARCUS JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dees v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00371
Defendant:
Steward Shaw, Officer A. Johnson, Officer Terrell and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Diaz et al
as 4:2020cv02208
Defendant:
Nortell, Jimenez, Penyate and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walker Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saidi v. Randall et al
as 1:2019cv01866
Defendant:
Woodlawn Police Department, Strumsky, J Higgin and others
Plaintiff:
Ben Mosbah Saidi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Miles v. Gresham et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2018cv00859
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dewayne Miles
Defendant:
Heath Taylor, Russell County Jail, Officer Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Russell County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2018cv00576
Plaintiff:
Maurice Antonio Brown
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Theresa Dyer and Officer Randall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moon v. Ellis et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2018cv00369
Plaintiff:
James Charley Moon
Defendant:
Dr. Ellis, Theresa Dyer, Officer Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. OFFICER RANDALL BAKER
as 3:2015cv00309
Plaintiff:
DEVINE STEPHEN ANDRE EDWARDS
Defendant:
OFFICER RANDALL BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Calhoun v. Timothy Outlaw, et al
as 15-60756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK D. CALHOUN
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY OUTLAW, Warden, DOTY, Warden, Marshall County Correctional Facility, OFFICER RANDALL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
