Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SMITH et al v. SAINT PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00598
Defendant:
BOB STELLER, MOBILE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INC., EDDIE CURRAN and others
Plaintiff:
EDMOND HUDMOND SMITH, IV and LOUIS HOLGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Tennessee State of, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00159
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNETT v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2016cv02973
Petitioner:
ROBERT BARNETT, SR.
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF N/A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barnett v. Hodges et al
as 3:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Robert Barnett
Defendant:
Marc Hodges, Assistant Warden Storm, Counselor Henton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Barnett v. Ty Bates, et al
as 13-2293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BARNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
TY BATES, Warden, WILLIAM PEYTON, Assistant Warden, HAROLD SCHULER, Lieutenant and others
Barnett v. Bates et al
as 3:2011cv00722
Plaintiff:
Robert Barnett
Defendant:
Warden Bates, Payton, Lt Schuler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd v. Dowell et al
as 1:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
Robert W Byrd
Defendant:
Rhonda Dowell, Robert Barnett and Richard Shephard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Shepard et al
as 1:2009cv00029
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Green
Defendant:
Richard Shepard, Robert Barnett and Rhonda Dowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Defoor v. Dowell et al
as 1:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
James Defoor
Defendant:
Rhonda Dowell, Richard Sheppard and Robert Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
