Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Wilson v. McClain et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Wilson
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nosakhare Onumonu v. MDOC, et al
as 23-1235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOSAKHARE N. ONUMONU
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, WARDEN JOHN DAVIDS and others
Wilson v. Brone et al
as 2:2022cv11337
Plaintiff:
Ray Wilson
Defendant:
Ron Brone, Samuel J. Bernstein, Marieh Tanha and others
Wilson v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv00077
Plaintiff:
Travis Ray Wilson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William F Straughn, Gaylon Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2020cv00848
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Dennis Ray Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Claiborne County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2018cv00360
Defendant:
Teresa Johnson, John Does and Claiborne County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ray Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. State of Texas et al
as 7:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Wilson
Defendant:
State of Texas, James V Allred Unit, James D Anders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Reno County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2018cv03085
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Wilson, Sr.
Defendant:
Reno County Sheriff's Office and Reno County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elijah Ford v. Michael Kennerly, et al
as 17-1583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIJAH M. FORD
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL C. KENNERLY, Physician Assistant, ROGER A. GERLACH, Medical Doctor, RICHARD CZOP, Medical Doctor and others
Ford #374376 v. Kennerly et al
as 1:2016cv00243
Plaintiff:
Elijah M. Ford #374376
Defendant:
Michael C. Kennerly, Roger Gerlach, Richard Czop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
