Cases 1 - 10 of 84
DAVIS v. USA
as 2:2024cv00334
Petitioner:
IKLAS RICHARD DAVIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DAVIS v. USA
as 2:2024cv00335
Petitioner:
IKLAS RICHARD DAVIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Dingle v. Sterling et al
as 2:2023cv05333
Plaintiff:
Eugene C Dingle
Defendant:
Candace Loreal Sterling, Tim Mose, Daniel Scoggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. Gregg County Sheriff's Office
as 6:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Richard Davis Peterson
Defendant:
Gregg County Sheriff's Office, Maxey Cerliano and Nurse Patty Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Snyder, et al
as 4:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Mr. Richard Davis and Mr Richard Davis
Defendant:
Michael Snyder and Max Ryden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sanders #305405 et al v. Macauley et al
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Sanders #305405, Anthony Murphy #769317, Maurice H. Fielding #666102 and others
Defendant:
Matt Macauley, Unknown Walzach, Brian Hadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boring v. Jones et al
as 6:2021cv06062
Plaintiff:
David Boring and David Baring
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Trent Daniels, United States Senate, Nurse Betty Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles v. Jones et al
as 6:2021cv06058
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Trent Daniels, United States Senate, Nurse Betty Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
David Charles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Novak, Jr. v. Jones et al
as 6:2021cv06055
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Trent Daniels, United States Senate, Nurse Betty Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Novak, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Jones et al
as 6:2021cv06064
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Trent Daniels, United States Senate, Nurse Betty Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Rayson Clayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
