Cases 1 - 10 of 181
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Onofre Serrano v. R. Bar et al
as 2:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Onofre Tommy Serrano
Defendant:
R. Bar, Casey Charles Mulholland, D Angelo Jerome Darby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Davis
as 24-10006
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dillard
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Former Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jimmy S. Smith, Senior Warden, Elbert G. Holmes, Former Assistant Warden and others
Contreras v. Carter et al
as 7:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant:
Paige L. Carter, Cody S. Miller and Bryan D. Reitsman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrone Shelton v. Tracy Mathena
as 23-6695
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE SHELTON
Defendant / Appellee:
TRACY MATHENA, TIM HAMM, SGT. J. COE and others
Tyrone Shelton v. David Anderson
as 23-6693
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE SHELTON
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID ANDERSON, TRACY MATHENA, SGT. J. COE and others
Kielly v. Miller et al
as 9:2023cv00717
Plaintiff:
Sara Kielly
Defendant:
S. Miller and Robert E. Ruger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Shebel et al
as 1:2023cv02513
Plaintiff:
Alex Diaz
Defendant:
Susan Shebel, Phisician Tawo, S. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emery Barron v. Wetzel, et al
as 23-1699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMERY BARRON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS (DOC/PA), KEVIN RANSOM, WARDEN OF SCI-DALLAS, S. MILLER, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT FOR CENTRALIZED SERVICE and others
Tretchler v. Miller
as 1:2023cv00366
Petitioner:
Zachary Charles Tretchler
Respondent:
Brian S. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
