Cases 1 - 10 of 20
UNDERWOOD v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KEITH UNDERWOOD and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Defendant:
PAUL THOMAS, Steven Walker and CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dorsey, Jr. v. Murphy et al
as 3:2020cv02679
Defendant:
Belal A. Tawil, Officer L. Nitkiewicz, Officer Paul Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Rooseveltt Dorsey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Former Guard Keyshawn Bledsoe et al
as 6:2020cv06085
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dr. Young, Advanced Practical Nurse Mrs. Long and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Steven Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Calhoun County et al
as 1:2020cv00955
Defendant:
Calhoun County Probation Office, Steven Walker, Matthew Wades and others
Plaintiff:
Detrick Elston Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Correct Care Solutions LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00050
Plaintiff:
Andrew Steven Walker
Defendant:
George D Wilson, Griswold, Estell Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Watkins et al
as 4:2017cv03560
Plaintiff:
Steven Walker
Defendant:
Chaplain Watkins, Chaplain Pack 1 Unit and Brian Lee Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Schweitzer
as 5:2017cv02361
Petitioner:
Steven Walker
Respondent:
Tom Schweitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORGAN v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00655
Plaintiff:
DENZEL MORGAN
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GIOVANNI NIEVES , MATTHEW CANTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner, I v. Walker et al
as 9:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
Willi Free Garner, I
Defendant:
Steven Walker, Kenneth Montgomery, John Hagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Beard et al
as 1:2013cv01556
Plaintiff:
Andrew R. Lopez
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Julie Olson, Steven Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
