Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Bailey v. Reign et al
as 2:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Shawn Douglas Bailey
Defendant:
NFN Reign and Kristi M Satterfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hager v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2022cv01229
Petitioner:
Shawn Douglas Hager
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colson v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv05585
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Paul Penzone, Vincent Companaro and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Douglas Colson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hager v. Washington County et al
as 0:2019cv02809
Defendant:
Washington County and State of Minnesota
Plaintiff:
Shawn Douglas Hager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Cullman County Detention Center
as 5:2018cv01805
Plaintiff:
Shawn Douglas Alexander Berryhill
Defendant:
Cullman County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawn Little v. Gregory Hammond, et al
as 17-1463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN DOUGLAS LITTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY HAMMOND, 37TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WARREN COUNTY COURTHOUSE, ANDMORGAN C. THOMAS and others
Defendant - Pro Se Appellee:
EVA C. STROUP
Moffett v. Harrison County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2016cv00402
Plaintiff:
Shawn Douglas Moffett
Defendant:
Harrison County Sheriff Department and Unknown Hailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITTLE v. HAMMOND et al
as 1:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
SHAWN DOUGLAS LITTLE
Defendant:
GREGORY J. HAMMOND , 37TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA , EVA C. STROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godfrey v. USA
as 0:2011cv02739
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shawn Douglas Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McMahon v. Rich
as 1:2009cv00353
Petitioner:
Shawn Douglas McMahon
Respondent:
S Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
