Cases 1 - 10 of 100
SEOANE v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2026cv00347
Plaintiff:
DONALD CARLOS SEOANE and DONNY LONG
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, First Lady CASEY DESANTIS, JAMES UTHMEIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Adamek et al
as 2:2026cv12490
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Cynthia Adamek, Stacey Robinson, Michelle Powell and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Louis v. Butkowski et al
as 1:2026cv13268
Plaintiff:
Carlens A Louis
Defendant:
Stacey Butkowski, Thomas M. Tocci, Wendy Creamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sirmons v. King Kistler et al
as 1:2026cv01932
Petitioner:
Christopher Sirmons, Jr.
Respondent:
Thomas King Kistler, DA Stacey Miller, Lindsy Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lembach #370051 et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2026cv08157
Plaintiff:
Frederick William Lembach, III and Trinity Rose Lembach
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Yavapai, County of, Dennis M McGrane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rutledge v. Guage et al
as 2:2026cv02693
Plaintiff:
Gary Tyrone Rutledge
Defendant:
Aaron Guage and Stacey Beam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Heathen Blodharn v. OH, et al
as 26-3590
Plaintiff:
HEATHEN BLODHARN
Defendant:
STATE OF OHIO, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, TRACY L. REVEAL and others
Laird v. Carey
as 2:2026cv04152
Petitioner:
Stacey Laird
Respondent:
Dwayne Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laird v. Carey
as 2:2026cv04151
Petitioner:
Stacey Laird
Respondent:
Dwayne Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
