Cases 1 - 10 of 334
Haynes v. Quinn et al
as 5:2024cv00125
Defendant:
FNU Starowicz, FNU Quinn, FNU Lay and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jeremy Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monderen v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
William Stange, Latonia Young-Griffin, Timothy Seabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Angela Dunbar
as 24-6363
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
ANGELA DUNBAR, WARDEN TIMOTHY S. STEWART, MS. STAR and others
Star v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
David Lee Star
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
STAR GREGORY A. TAYLOR
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, FRANK VANIHEL, K. FISCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Schiffer et al
as 1:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Jenniffer B Schiffer, John Addison Howard, Roberl Brisco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Weathers v. Commonwealth of KY, et al. et al
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Weathers
Defendant:
Commonwealth of KY, et al. and Five Star Food Mart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Star v. Winstead
as 1:2023cv01641
Petitioner:
Michael Star
Respondent:
Desha Hall Winstead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith (PS) v. Star
as 1:2023cv02844
Petitioner:
Donald Smith and James Brookes
Respondent:
Star
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Webb v. Star et al
as 5:2023cv00972
Plaintiff:
Michael Webb
Defendant:
FNU Star
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
