Cases 1 - 10 of 330
Jones #326158 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00967
Plaintiff:
Melanie L Jones
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Centurion Healthcare, NaphCare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Turean T. Johnson
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Doe I et al
as 6:2024cv03116
Plaintiff:
Wayne T Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Farner v. Redmond et al
as 3:2024cv50058
Plaintiff:
Joshua S Farner
Defendant:
Robert Redmond, Justin Egler, Major Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Mixson et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Darren Douglas
Defendant:
W. Mixson, T. Johnson and STATEFARM Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Boykins et al
as 2:2023cv02803
Plaintiff:
Justin T. Johnson
Defendant:
K. Boykins, Off. Bailey, D.R.T. Off. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PALSON v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
COREY D. PALSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT M. ZAKEN, S. BUZAS, SECURITY C.O. I T. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Naugle et al
as 3:2023cv02988
Plaintiff:
Michael T Johnson
Defendant:
R. Naugle, Jennifer Cowan and Anthony D. Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv02707
Plaintiff:
Michael T Johnson
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills, Curtis L Dallas, Yvette Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
