Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Cameron v. Ellis III et al
as 1:2023cv00714
Petitioner:
Alexander Cameron
Respondent:
T.S. Ellis III, Circuit Court for the City of Alexandria, United States District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson v. Pfieffer et al
as 0:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Sarah Pfieffer, Amy Draeger, T.S. Barnetto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Cruz v. Pfeiffer et al
as 1:2020cv01825
Defendant:
S. Ballestoro, W.J. Sullivan, C. Pfeiffer and others
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Cruz v. Pfeiffer et al
as 1:2020cv01522
Defendant:
Quinonez, W.J. Sullivan, C. Pfeiffer and others
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Cruz v. Pfeifer et al
as 1:2020cv01492
Defendant:
W.J. Sullivan, C. Pfeifer and T.S. Arlitz
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Ulep et al
as 1:2020cv00345
Defendant:
Nurse Walker, Dr. Benjamin T. Ulep, Nurse Butts and others
Plaintiff:
Karsten O. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowling v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00453
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, M.L. Counts, J. Kiser and others
Plaintiff:
Mario L. Bowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 1:2019cv00016
Defendant:
MELLANDER, DAVIS, CHARLES FAENZA and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Stewart et al
as 1:2018cv03420
Defendant:
S. Sheetz, Solomon Hejirika, A. Edmonds and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tucker Jones v. Stewart et al
as 1:2018cv03208
Defendant:
Mr. Huff, B. Weaver, K. hansrote and others
Plaintiff:
Terrell Tucker Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
