Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Johnson v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv01582
Plaintiff:
Timothy Johnson, Timothy L. Johnson and Timothy Leverne Johnson
Defendant:
Glenn Woods, Rhett Holden, Rodney A. Bostick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Brooks v. Gallagher et al
as 4:2024cv05028
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
K Gallagher, Lisa Robtoy, Lori Ramsdellgilkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lavergne v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lavergne
Defendant:
Timothy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Tenney et al
as 4:2023cv05163
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
Nancy Tenney, Corey Endo, K. Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robin Fahr v. Timothy Johnson, et al
as 23-15905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBIN JOY FAHR
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRITTNIE SOSA, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, D. REVERE, Unknown; Assistant Deputy Warden and others
Johnson v. Jackson
as 4:2023cv01753
Petitioner:
Timothy Johnson and Timothy L. Johnson
Respondent:
S. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv00913
Plaintiff:
Ronald Timothy Johnson, Sr
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Coker et al
as 4:2021cv03736
Plaintiff:
Timothy Johnson
Defendant:
Shannon Coker, Richard McCollugh, Glenn Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2021cv03013
Plaintiff:
Timothy Johnson
Defendant:
Bryan Lumpkin and Warden J. Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kaufman County
as 3:2021cv02052
Petitioner:
Timothy Johnson
Respondent:
Kaufman County and Merida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
